So, who is Gregory ‘guy that signs stuff’ Kolt? Well, as his name implies he is the man who has to sign off on just about everything. How loud you may talk, how fast you may walk and even when you may take a bathroom break. You can just imagine that Gregory, as Dean of the School of Science and Health at Western Sydney University (WSU), has a huge number of documents that he needs to sign on a daily basis in order to keep his subjects in line. On top of this, he is also the man to whom the director of the National Institute of Complementary Medicine (NICM) reports, and hence he also signs off on almost everything that the NICM plan to do. Regular readers of this Blog will by now know, that most things that the NICM does is simply put, dishonest, and as such Gregory is fully aware of what the NICM is up to. He is, after all, on the NICM’s advisory board where ways to make more money by misleading the public is openly discussed. And again, if you can promote, defend or sell water as medicine to sick children then you are not only dishonest but, in my view, a common criminal.
Because of this, the ‘guy that signs stuff’ was nominated for the Bent Spoon award (awarded to the pseudoscientist of the year) with Alan Bensoussan (director of the NICM) and Barney Glover (VC of WSU), because these three musketeers are fully aware that what they are doing is at best dishonest and that it will have a detrimental impact on society. They tried their best to block this nomination, but to no avail, with their measly attempts now providing us with some excellent reading material (you can find it here). Unfortunately, they did not win the award in 2016, but hopefully they will have better luck in 2017.
It turns out that Gregory has signed one too many document, or to be more exact, 137 too many documents. It is a type of document that claims money for patients that do not exist – oops. You can find the description of the court case here (page 36). Below is a copy:
“GREGORY SHANE KOLT
Date of offence: Between 1996 and 1998
Date of prosecution: 19 January 2000 at Melbourne Magistrates’ Court
Magistrate: John Hardy
The defendant, a physiotherapist, submitted invoices claiming payment from the Victorian WorkCover Authority in relation to his purported treatment of four injured workers. The invoices related to 137 physiotherapy consultations that had never taken place. As a result, the defendant fraudulently obtained a total of $5,864.15 from the Authority over a period of 14 months. When the matter was investigated, the defendant provided false information and documents.
Breaches of the Accident Compensation Act 1985, sections 248(1) and 249(1) x 2.
The magistrate noted that the defendant made admissions and full restitution to the Victorian WorkCover Authority. In ruling out conviction, the magistrate referred to Section 8(1) of the Sentencing Act i.e. the impact of a conviction on the defendant’s career. He also acknowledged that the defendant had no prior convictions and an extraordinary record of professional achievement and community involvement. Result: Without conviction, fined $2,500 re: Section 248(1) and $1,500 re: Section 249(1). Total fine $4,000 plus $1,022 costs.”
Some might now say that digging up old court cases, to put someone on the spot many years later, is maybe not a nice thing to do. Many people make mistakes, pay for it and then learn from it. But I am afraid that this court case show that Gregory planned his offence well, it occurred over a long period of time and then he tried to mislead the investigators or cover up his actions. And this means, in one word, that he is a dishonest person. Dishonesty is something that runs in your blood and it is part of your DNA, and if you draw the line through to 2017, not much has changed. Dishonesty is of course not all bad, for example; with this sparkling attribute you can easily find a job with just about any political party, the mafia also comes to mind, and then of course, you can also become the guy that signs off on all of the NICM’s dishonest plans. Once a dishonest person, always a dishonest person? But enough on Gregory for the time being (I am sure there will be more to come).
There is another interesting example, just to illustrate the type of people that the NICM work with. This time it relates to a convicted person. In 2006 Yu Long Yu was sentenced after a large amount of endangered animal material, including Rhino horn, tiger etc, was found in his possession. Because mister Yu was (is) a business partner of Alan Bensoussan (director of the NICM), Alan was in court to defend his good friend: “Character witnesses – including Alan Bensoussan, director of the Centre for Complementary Medicine Research at the University of Western Sydney – told the court Yu was “absolutely exceptional”. “There are very few clinicians of his ilk in Australia,” Professor Bensoussan said of his friend and sometime business associate of 20 years.” “He [the barrister] said Yu had tried to pull the wool over officials’ eyes.”
And again, we have a person who tried to BS officials. One would think that Alan as a ‘honest scientist’ would try his best to explain to Mr Yu that traditional Chinese medicine is based on pre-scientific ideas, and as such, is dangerous not only for people but also for (endangered) animals (they are currently skinning donkeys alive for their purported medicinal value). But I guess this would have been to honest thing to do and honesty does not sit well with the NICM. So, here and here you can read about the NICM’s view on using endangered animals as medicine. Mr Yu was send to jail for a while, and as expected, the NICM is currently still collaborating with him.
The examples that I have given here are not isolated cases, but it should help to paint the picture of the type of people that you need at an Institute such as the NICM. My next article will give another example of an even grander scale of dishonesty where, as it currently stands, they are trying to cover up their undeclared conflicts of interest. And as usual, money seems to be at the heart of the problem. It turns out that these people are not only above the laws of nature as expressed by physics, chemistry, biology etc., but they are also above the rules that should ensure scientific integrity – it simply does not apply to them.